Learning, Innovation & Tech

Bombs & Breakthroughs

Disrupt or be disrupted: the original article + the response

SMW, October 16, 2013 10:59 PM


"His job appears to be to convince a generation of people
who want to do good and do well
to learn, instead, remorselessness.
Forget rules, obligations, your conscience, loyalty, a sense of the commonweal.
- Jill Lepore

Join Us

by C.J. Westerberg

A big sprawling wowapalooza article about innovation and disruption; even Clayton Christensen gets toppled off his throne. It's a necessary piece - one that I expect will get much traction - because the worship of disruption has been myopic, often driven by fear of being left out in the cold as opposed to considered choices.  Journalist Jill Lepore nails this sentiment via The New Yorker in The Disruption Machine.

While I think that most institutions need re-inventing of some sort (and I'm not playing semantics here), all change is not equal. Learning and the education business (two different things) are now front and center in the  innovation conversation. Sadly, many truly needed inventions may be lost by the hype machine wanting only what can be networked and scaled fast and furiously, as opposed to what may be valuable and worthwhile.

There are some great thoughts in Lepore's piece.  Here are two notable excerpts :

Most big ideas have loud critics. Not disruption.
Disruptive innovation as the explanation for how change happens has been subject to little serious criticism, partly because it's headlong,
while critical inquiry is unhurried;
partly because disrupters ridicule doubters by charging them with fogyism,
as if to criticize a theory of change were identical to decrying change;
and partly because, in its modern usage,
innovation is the idea of progress jammed into a criticism-proof jack-in-the-box.

And here is the social/cultural connection:

Disruptive innovation is a theory about why businesses fail.
It's not more than that.
 It doesn't explain change. It's not a law of nature. It's an artifact of history, an idea,
forged in time; it's the manufacture of a moment of upsetting and edgy uncertainty.
Transfixed by change, it's blind to continuity.
It makes a very poor prophet.

The upstarts who work at startups don't often stay at any one place for very long.
(Three out of four startups fail. More than nine out of ten never earn a return.)
They work a year here, a few months there - zany hours everywhere.
They wear jeans and sneakers and ride scooters and share offices and
sprawl on couches like Great Danes.
Their coffee machines look like dollhouse-size factories.

They are told that they should be reckless and ruthless.

Their investors, if they're like Josh Linkner, tell them that the world is a terrifying place,
moving at a devastating pace."Today I run a venture capital firm and back the next generation of innovators who are, as I was throughout my earlier career,
dead-focused on eating your lunch," Linkner writes.

His job appears to be to convince a generation of people who want to do good and
do well to learn, instead, remorselessness.
Forget rules, obligations, your conscience, loyalty, a sense of the commonweal.
If you start a business and it succeeds, Linkner advises, sell it and take the cash.
Don't look back. Never pause.
Disrupt or be disrupted.

But they do pause and they do look back, and they wonder.
Meanwhile, they tweet, they post, they tumble in and out of love, they ponder.
They send one another sly messages, touching the screens of sleek, soundless machines
with a worshipful tenderness.

  • Ian Hecht

    Yes, great article. My favourite piece:

    "Doctors have obligations to their patients, teachers to their students,
    pastors to their congregations, curators to the public, and journalists
    to their readers—obligations that lie outside the realm of earnings, and
    are fundamentally different from the obligations that a business
    executive has to employees, partners, and investors."

    So true.

blog comments powered by Disqus
It had long since come to my attention that people of accomplishment rarely sat back and let things happen to them. They went out and happened to things.
Leonardo da Vinci
Follow The Daily Riff on Follow TDR on Twitter

find us on facebook



CJ Westerberg, 11.04.2014

Now almost 16 million views - "brilliant" video - under two minutes

Read Post | Comments

Riffing good stories

Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for test-taker.cartoonbox2.slate.com.gif

The problem with tests that are not standardized

CJ Westerberg, 11.03.2014

Alfie Kohn delivers a blow to teacher-created tests (the wrong kind for the wrong reasons)

Read Post | Comments

Being Pegged, Late Bloomers and Effort

CJ Westerberg, 10.30.2014

How 2012 Nobel Prize Winner Dissed by His High School Biology Teacher

Read Post | Comments

Hacking School Ratings & Test Scores

CJ Westerberg, 10.30.2014

"Recognizing that their students learn best when actively engaged, Consortium Schools typically use inquiry-based methods of learning . . ."

Read Post | Comments

NEW POST: Veteran Teacher "Shadows" High School

CJ Westerberg, 10.29.2014

Admits to Teacher Snark Directed at Students

Read Post | Comments

21 Things That Will Become Obsolete in Education by 2020

CJ Westerberg, 10.13.2014

Desks, Language Labs, Computers, Homework, Standardized Tests in College Admissions . . . .

Read Post | Comments

The Parent Trapped

CJ Westerberg, 09.14.2014

September 4, 2014 - Author Cathy Buyrn sends us an update. "While educators beat the drum about the importance of parental involvement in their child's education, many really mean parental compliance."

Read Post | Comments

Ideal Elite College Students: "Excellent Sheep"

SMW, 09.09.2014

"Everybody - administrators, admissions officers, faculty and students - knows that the pressures of the resume race are out of control."

Read Post | Comments

10 Things to do on the first day of school

CJ Westerberg, 09.03.2014

When was the last time you talked about learning?

Read Post | Comments