Financial Literacy: Making Math Relevant

CJ Westerberg, October 9, 2013 10:28 AM



"Students rarely see adults using the quadratic formula,
computing with imaginary numbers, proving trigonometric identities, or solving systems of algebraic equations, for the simple reason that most adults have no need to do these kinds of problems."

- Joseph Ganem

Financial Literacy: Making Math Relevant

By Joseph Ganem, Ph.D.

The financial crisis of 2008-09 has prompted proposals in many states to add financial literacy requirements to the high school curriculum. This sudden fervor for teaching our children personal finance presents pitfalls and opportunities for educators.

First, some of the pitfalls: Much of the rhetoric from politicians advocating financial literacy requirements is misdirection.  For example, Maryland Comptroller Peter Franchot advocating in The Baltimore Sun for a proposal in the Maryland legislature wrote:

"Thus, in far too many instances, we entered into financial commitments that we couldn't afford, with terms and conditions that we didn't truly understand, in order to buy things that we really didn't need. If more Marylanders had the benefit of sound financial literacy education, fewer of our friends and family members would be facing the loss of homes and life savings today."

This line of reasoning makes no sense. No amount of knowledge will fix dishonesty and deceit. After all, the executives at failed companies such as Countrywide, Bear Sterns, Lehman Brothers, and AIG, were all knowledgeable, sophisticated investors whose greed led to disastrous financial decisions that bankrupted their companies. Knowledge alone will not substitute for good character and good judgment. It's naive to think that better financial education for the average person will prevent future financial crises when the most financially astute among us made even worse decisions. It's misdirection to blame consumers for the failure of a financial system run by business executives and politicians who knew better and refused to take responsibility for their actions.

Another pitfall is what I call the "check-box approach to education." That is the continual addition of stand-alone requirements that students view as hoops to jump through rather than education to be obtained. Too much of the school curriculum consists of lists of facts to memorize, presented as distinct and separate from each other. There is little integration between all the lists so students often fail to see the relevance of anything that they are required to learn.

But, it is from this second pitfall that I see opportunity. Personal finance education is a laudable goal, even if the motives of its advocates are suspect. However, financial literacy should be integrated into the current math curriculum rather than taught separately. Such an approach would have the added benefit of showing students that math is relevant, because knowledge of math leads to personal financial gain.

Of all the school subjects, math presents the most difficulty because students often don't see its relevance. The truth is much of what is taught in math class is not relevant. Students rarely see adults using the quadratic formula, computing with imaginary numbers, proving trigonometric identities, or solving systems of algebraic equations, for the simple reason that most adults have no need to do these kinds of problems.

However, everyone makes decisions in the marketplace and most of these decisions require comparing numbers. Too often consumers make poor decisions because they fail to understand the context of financial numbers. A large part of this problem arises because our schools fail in teaching students "quantitative literacy," which is educational jargon for facility with numbers and arithmetic. But quantitative literacy is the most important of all mathematical skills because it is the one area of math that impacts all of our lives, each and every day.

A large fraction of my writing and speaking has focused on quantitative literacy applied to personal finance. In my book, "The Two Headed Quarter: How to See Through Deceptive Numbers and Save Money on Everything You Buy", on Websites I've authored such as ComputeGasSavings, and in talks and seminars I've presented, my goal is to completely change the way people think about numbers when they make financial decisions.

"By jumping to algebra before quantitative skills are mastered, students never understand the motivation for algebra and why it is so important."

For the numerically illiterate, numbers can deceive in both small and large financial decisions. For example, on ComputeGasSavings questions are posed to challenge thinking on some mundane purchase decisions such as:

  •  How far should you drive to buy cheaper gas?
  •  Is money saved when you buy on sale?

Also posed are some financially significant questions such as:

  • Does 0% financing save you money on car?
  • Is it worth going to work?

The answers to these questions are not as obvious as they appear, because there is both a benefit and a cost associated with each choice. It is easy to see the benefit, but it takes an understanding of numbers to see the cost. Whether the benefit is more than the cost depends on an individual's circumstances, which means that there are no pat-answers to the questions. You have to do the math to find the choice that is right for you.

On the Website, each question has an article explaining the mathematical reasoning and an online calculator to test different scenarios. From an educational point of view, once the reasoning is understood the questions can be probed deeper. For example, how do these calculators work and how did I program them? (Hint: I couldn't have done it without using algebra.) What other kinds of cost-benefit questions can you pose? What algebra would you use to answer the questions? Can you create Web-based calculators to answer the questions?

In fact, learning to think quantitatively leads naturally to the subject of algebra. This is where our math curriculum goes wrong. By jumping to algebra before quantitative skills are mastered, students never understand the motivation for algebra and why it is so important. Integrating personal finance education into math class can improve math skills and financial decision-making. Math classes can become a model for showing that practical skills can arise from academic achievements.

Published The Daily Riff June 2010

Joseph Ganem, Ph.D., website here, is a professor of physics at Loyola University Maryland, and author of the award-winning book on personal finance: "The Two Headed Quarter: How to See Through Deceptive Numbers and Save Money on Everything You Buy".  It shows how numbers fool consumers when they make financial decisions.

(Editor's Note: Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said in August to teachers in Washington, "Financial education supports not only individual well- being, but also the economic health of our nation." He continued, "Consumers who can make informed decisions about financial products and services not only serve their own best interests, but, collectively, they also help promote broader economic stability."  It always astonishes me when I witness financial illiteracy by students who have completed advanced math subjects in high school.  Joseph Ganem, in this guest post above, riffs about how financial literacy should be incorporated into the existing math curriculum rather than being taught separately. What do you think?   - C.J. Westerberg) .

Related Posts The Daily Riff:

Visions of Math: What Content Should We Teach?  featuring High Tech High's Ben Daley

A Radical Idea for Changing Math Education

Too Obsessed with Math?  Was Einstein Right about Imagination? by C.J. Westerberg
Riff and Video about E.O. Wilson, Pulitzer Prize winning Harvard professor and uber sociobiologist who didn't take Algebra until freshman year in College (!)

Stephen Colbert to Mr. Math: Lies, Damned Lies!

blog comments powered by Disqus
It had long since come to my attention that people of accomplishment rarely sat back and let things happen to them. They went out and happened to things.
Leonardo da Vinci
Follow The Daily Riff on Follow TDR on Twitter

find us on facebook


Stephen Colbert's Sound Advice: How To Ace The SAT's

CJ Westerberg, 11.05.2014

Tip #1: "Spend A Lot Of Money . . ."

Read Post | Comments

Riffing good stories



CJ Westerberg, 11.04.2014

Now almost 16 million views - "brilliant" video - under two minutes

Read Post | Comments
Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for

The problem with tests that are not standardized

CJ Westerberg, 11.03.2014

Alfie Kohn delivers a blow to teacher-created tests (the wrong kind for the wrong reasons)

Read Post | Comments

Being Pegged, Late Bloomers and Effort

CJ Westerberg, 10.30.2014

How 2012 Nobel Prize Winner Dissed by His High School Biology Teacher

Read Post | Comments

Hacking School Ratings & Test Scores

CJ Westerberg, 10.30.2014

"Recognizing that their students learn best when actively engaged, Consortium Schools typically use inquiry-based methods of learning . . ."

Read Post | Comments

NEW POST: Veteran Teacher "Shadows" High School

CJ Westerberg, 10.29.2014

Admits to Teacher Snark Directed at Students

Read Post | Comments

21 Things That Will Become Obsolete in Education by 2020

CJ Westerberg, 10.13.2014

Desks, Language Labs, Computers, Homework, Standardized Tests in College Admissions . . . .

Read Post | Comments

The Parent Trapped

CJ Westerberg, 09.14.2014

September 4, 2014 - Author Cathy Buyrn sends us an update. "While educators beat the drum about the importance of parental involvement in their child's education, many really mean parental compliance."

Read Post | Comments

Ideal Elite College Students: "Excellent Sheep"

SMW, 09.09.2014

"Everybody - administrators, admissions officers, faculty and students - knows that the pressures of the resume race are out of control."

Read Post | Comments