Learning, Innovation & Tech

Bombs & Breakthroughs

How 7 Principles Of Baseball Can Help Transform How Teachers Teach

CJ Westerberg, July 16, 2013 2:58 PM

baseball.jpg

A TDR Classic post -

"Elementitis and aboutitis are devil's bargains.
They make learning superficially easier today,
but young learners find it dull and
also don't develop the active understandings we really want.
"

-David Perkins


How to Teach So Kids Can Learn to Understand

by C.J. Westerberg

Harvard School of Education Professor David Perkins claims he was never very good at sports.

Yet he uses the baseball metaphor throughout his new book, Making Learning Whole:  How Seven Principles of Teaching Can Transform Education, because he believes too many teachers teach "with the whole game nowhere in sight" which lead to two major plagues in education: elementitus and aboutitus.  Plus he knows most of us are suckers for sport analogies.

As Perkins admits in a recent Ed. The Magazine for the Harvard School of Education:

"We educators always face the challenge of helping our students approach complex skills and ideas. So what to do? The two most familiar strategies are learning by elements and learning about. In the elements approach, we break down the topic or skill into elements and teach them separately, putting off the whole game until later -- often much later. So students end up practicing meaningless pieces to score well on quizzes without developing a sense of the whole game, like the kids . . .who can do the computations but don't know what operations to use when. This is a persistent plague of education, so to have a little fun I call it 'elementitis.' "

He continues to the second plague of teaching:

"In the learning about approach, instead of teaching how to do the thing in question, we teach about it. For instance, we teach information about key science concepts rather than teaching students how to look at and think about the world around them with those concepts, which supposedly comes later. But again, the information tends to be meaningless without a context of use, and often "later" never happens. This is another plague of education, so to have some more fun I call it 'aboutitis'. "

Perkins has impressive credentials (except in the sports arena):   senior professor at Harvard School of Education, co-director of Project Zero, Harvard's Teaching for Understanding initiative, and and author of several books, including Smart Schools and The Eureka Effect.  As an MIT undergrad majoring in Math, Perkins argument extends to Math education with some interesting first-hand flashbacks to his own experiences, yet always circling back to how we can teach kids today to "learn more effectively" in all subjects: 

"When kids learn math in a conventional way, they practice the computational skills but often don't develop a very good sense of what math is for or how to use it. We know this because many youngsters have a hard time picking out what operation to use -- is this a "plus" situation, a "minus" situation, a "times" situation? They've been practicing their batting without developing a sense of the whole math game."

"We do sometimes teach the whole game, particularly around subjects often -- and unfortunately in my view -- considered more marginal: athletics, music, the arts. Also, ideally children first learn about reading by being read to a lot, so they have a sense of the whole game, and as they develop their decoding skills they soon practice on simple small-scale texts that nonetheless try to be interesting and meaningful."

"Why not for math, science, and history? Is it because that's how teachers themselves learned?

There are several reasons. Partly, yes, it's a matter of the way teachers themselves learned. Partly it's because learning bits and pieces now and putting them together later simplifies the classroom routine: it's easier to work on isolated pieces. Partly because when kids make mistakes, the most obvious mistakes concern the pieces -- arithmetic errors, misspellings, facts not remembered. Partly it's a failure of imagination, a failure to figure out what small-scale accessible meaningful versions of mathematical modeling or building historical interpretations would look like for children.
"

"Elementitis and aboutitis are devil's bargains. They make learning superficially easier today, but young learners find it dull and also don't develop the active understandings we really want."

Perkins summarizes the "Seven Principles of Teaching":

1.    Play the whole game.
 
2.    Make the game worth playing. Motivation and relevance are key.

3.    Work on the hard parts. While he advocates the whole game, he clarifies that he doesn't mean "just" the whole game.

4.    Play out of town. 
In Red Sox Nation, it's a resonant sports metaphor, but it also refers to the transfer of knowledge from one context to another.

5.    Play the hidden game. 
A stats view of baseball is one of baseball's "hidden games." In baseball, algebra, or anything else we learn, there are richer, more layered aspects than show up on the surface...drawing "learners into the game of inquiry."

6.    Learn from the team. 
Perkins notes the importance of social learning, and he urges students to learn from teammates and from other "teams"--other students in different roles.

7.    Learn the game of learning. 
Perkins suggests that teachers allow students to be  in charge of their own learning by putting them in the driver's seat and letting them take control--rather than having them sit in the passenger seat and watch their education
 roll by.

Perkins cites a school that, in this era of high-stakes testing, has emphasized diagnostic testing as a tool for individual students to understand their progress and determine what to focus on next. "What particularly struck me," Perkins writes, was that with a little help "the students, not the teachers, took stock of their own progress. The tests were framed emphatically as tools to provide information, not appraisals of worth."


Making Learning Whole makes a significant case for utilizing "problem finding" in teaching, as distinguished from problem solving.  







The Problem with Math Instruction
During the time he spent as an MIT student, Perkins deftly elaborates how he noticed that while learning Math, all the problems came from a text or instructor, not from a project or an open-ended investigation.  At the time, he wondered why Math learning wasn't more like the Humanities, where problem finding is routine.  

He explored this question more deeply.  Problem solving is the art and craft of finding the solution to a problem that is clear.  Problem finding is figuring out what the problem is and even redefining it.  As with the Humanities, one asks "what questions are worth pursuing?"  One must then assemble a great argument, learn where to find the relevant resources to make the case, bundle it together for a compelling statement.  Why not with Math?

Perkins also refers to the work of teacher Kenna Barger of Elkins, West Va., recipient of the Disney 2001 American Teacher Award, which inspired the M-PACT program at the University of Arizona.  This program is "learning Math with a purpose, application, context and technology".
He continues to elaborate why these programs have the earmarks of whole game learning and teaching:   

"In settings of learning a whole game is generally some kind of inquiry or performance in a broad sense.  It involves problem solving, explanation, argument, evidence, strategy, skill, craft.  Often something gets created - a solution, an image, a story, an essay, a model.

It's never just about content. 
Learners are trying to get better at doing something. 

It's never just routine. 
It requires thinking with what you know and pushing further.
Rather than just standard routine problems, it involves open-ended or ill-structured problems.  All of these endeavors asked the learners to go beyond what they already knew and extrapolate to novel and puzzling situations.


It's never just problem solving. 
It involves problem finding.

It's not just about right answers. 
It involves explanation and justification.

It's not emotionally flat. 
It involves curiosity, discovery, creativity, camaraderie."

###

Previously published by both Ed Magazine from Harvard School of Education
and The Daily Riff January 2010
.


To purchase Making Learning Whole from Amazon, click here.









Enhanced by Zemanta
blog comments powered by Disqus
It had long since come to my attention that people of accomplishment rarely sat back and let things happen to them. They went out and happened to things.
Leonardo da Vinci
Follow The Daily Riff on Follow TDR on Twitter

find us on facebook

stress2.girl-in-a-jar.jpg

A Response to: Is Your Child a "Warrior" or "Worrier"?

CJ Westerberg, 11.07.2013

Why Some Kids Handle Test Pressure and Others . . . Not.

Read Post | Comments

Riffing good stories

parents.stupid. parent. swing.jpg

The New Stupid: Parents

CJ Westerberg, 11.07.2013

"I think you're Crazy . . . . . .You really think you're in control??" -Gnarls Barkley

Read Post | Comments
bill-gates.FT.Financial-Times.jpg

Cool Smart Teen: Changing the conversation about building stuff

SMW, 11.04.2013

Not just building an app to play with . . . but a test for cancer

Read Post | Comments
Munch.Scream.jpg

Am I Preparing Students for My Age or Theirs?

CJ Westerberg, 11.03.2013

I can never understand how and why we expect students with far more energy, ideas, natural creativity and far more everything, to be more "contained" in their behavior than adults.

Read Post | Comments
Stanford.design-thinking. innovation.jpg

Video: What is the link between "design-thinking" and creativity?

SMW, 11.03.2013

Creative Confidence: Must-Watch Interview on Charlie Rose

Read Post | Comments
early education.preschool.jpg

How Much Do Early Years Lead to Student Success?

CJ Westerberg, 11.03.2013

"The idea being that wasn't necessarily to create little engineers everywhere, though that would be great for us. The idea was to take advantage of the natural learning process and curiosity that children have at that age . . ." Tamika Lang, Boeing

Read Post | Comments
weekend-reading.jpg

NEW: Weekend Reading

SMW, 11.03.2013

Looking for Intimacy in the Age of Facebook is a higher education course (yes, you heard right). Interestingly, social media may inhibit creativity and innovation

Read Post | Comments
CV.digital.jpg

The New Resume

SMW, 10.31.2013

A picture is worth a thousand words. A video game-like format is worth . . .

Read Post | Comments
red.blue.abstract.jpg

Noam Chomsky: The Purpose of Education

CJ Westerberg, 10.31.2013

"Education is really aimed at helping students get to the point where they can learn on their own. . . "

Read Post | Comments