if he can't learn simple biological facts
he would have no chance of doing the work of a specialist,
and it would be a sheer waste of time,
both on his part and of those who would have to teach him."
recent Nobel Prize winner
Nobel Prize Winner Dissed
by His High School Biology Teacher
Short Video Below
This is a story about a new "famous failure" who,
at the age of 79, was just honored with the
Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine. His name
is John B. Gurdon who won for his discovery of
how certain mature cells can be remade into young cells that can be developed into body tissue. Not exactly inconsequential stuff here -
this is stem cell research that goes beyond what we think may be
possible. This honor was shared with Shinya Yamanaka of Japan.
The schoolmaster left such an indelible impression (see above quote)
that Gurdon brings up this nightmarish assessment at the 55 second
mark in the short video below - do check it out - it's priceless.
Terri Pou at TIME writes how Gurdon joins the ranks of other famous failures such as "Woodrow Wilson - governor of New Jersey,
Nobel Peace Prize winner, and President of the United States -
couldn't read until he was more than 10 years old; his teachers
lumped him in with the slower children in class. Nikola Tesla,
a revolutionary scientist whose work on alternating currents is often overlooked in favor of the accomplishments of his mentor
Thomas Edison, was accused of cheating after he performed
integral calculus in his head. . ."
struggled to overcome the impression that
they would never amount to anything."
to a student for different reasons. Plus, how do we know for sure?
Does the teaching culture of the school exhibit one-size-fits-all pedagogy? Are there various modes and opportunities to learn? Do teachers
have the time and resources to accommodate students' varied needs?
Or, do we just love to pigeon-hole students?
According to Carol Dweck, in her classic must-read book, Mindset,
pegging students is a perfect fit with a "fixed mindset". Here are
excerpts (pps. 39-42) that describe how it works and how devastating
it can be:
The story of the tortoise and the hare, in trying to put forward the power of effort, gave effort a bad name. It reinforced the image that effort is for the plodders and suggested that in rare instances, when talented people dropped the ball, the plodder could sneak through.
. . . The problem was that these stories made it into an either-or. Either you have ability or you expend effort. And this is part of the fixed mindset. Effort is for those who don't have the ability. People with the fixed mindset tell us,"If you have to work at something, you must not be good at it. They add,"Things come easily to people who are true geniuses."
Dweck points out how a "growth mindset" differs from the fixed mindset:Malcolm Gladwell, the author and New Yorker writer, has suggested that as a society we value natural, effortless accomplishment over achievement through effort. We endow our heroes with superhuman abilities that led them inevitably toward their greatness.
And, lastly, Dweck illustrates beautifully how a fixed mindset can hurtPeople with the growth mindset, however, believe something
very different. For them, even geniuses have to work hard
for their achievements. And what's so heroic, they would say,
about having a gift? They may appreciate endowment, but they admire effort, for no matter what your ability is, effort is what ignites that ability and turns it into accomplishment.
those considered "a genius, a talent, or a natural." However, even though this particular quote states the advantages of those who have nothing to lose by trying, one needs to understand that Dweck is referring to those students who have a growth mindset or at the very least are guided by adults with that over-arching value system. Otherwise, these "nothing
to lose" students end up thinking and acting more like "why bother?"
when it comes to effort.
From the point of view of the fixed mindset effort is only for
people with deficiencies. And when people already know they're deficient, they have nothing to lose by trying. But if your claim
to fame is not having any deficiencies - if you're considered
a genius, a talent, or a natural - then you have a lot to lose.
Effort can reduce you.
about his difficulty with memorization. In fact, Pou writes (with the
same title as this post) that "Gurdon attributes his inauspicious
start to the fact that his bad memory failed him during a time
when schools did not use textbooks and students had to memorize
verbal lectures. The British scientist made up for lost time
(and knowledge) and eventually studied zoology at Oxford."
and the lack of textbooks, one wonders if and how much would
textbooks help if he struggled with memory. The reason why I
bring this up is because student testing with open-book or
open-laptop is an important issue educators are grappling with today: whether to, how much, when, such as at what mastery level,
and so on.
What we DO know is that Gurdon had his books "open" while
researching and experimenting. Plus, he collaborated.
The 3 Rules of Mindsets by Daniel Pink
Related The Daily Riff:
Michael Jordan: "Maybe I Made You Led You to Believe It Was Easy . . . When It Wasn't" -VIDEO
Are We Wrong about Motivation? Daniel Pink Thinks So
Do Our Kids Know What It Takes to Be Good at Something? Fires of the Mind