Learning, Innovation & Tech

Bombs & Breakthroughs

Common Core: Standard Children?

CJ Westerberg, October 9, 2015 8:00 PM


"For example, a child entering kindergarten is now
expected to know the difference
between informative/explanatory writing and opinion writing."
- Dr. Joseph Ganem

The Common Core Can't Speed Up Child Development

by Joe Ganem

Recent evaluations of the state's preschoolers have determined that only 47 percent
are ready for kindergarten, compared to 83 percent judged ready last year. This drastic
drop isn't the result of an abrupt, catastrophic decline in the cognitive abilities of our children. Instead it results from a re-definition of kindergarten readiness, which now means being
able to succeed academically at a level far beyond anything expected in the past.
For example, a child entering kindergarten is now expected to know the difference
between informative/explanatory writing and opinion writing. The concern is that
preschoolers without that knowledge will not succeed at meeting the new higher-level Common-Core standards.

However, I think a more pressing concern is: Why do we have educational standards
that are not aligned with even the most basic facts of human development? Clearly
these test results show that the problem is with the standards, not the children.

Educational attainment is part of human development, and fundamentally this is
a biological process that cannot be sped up. We cannot wish away our biological limitations because we find them inconvenient. Children will learn crawling, walking, listening,
talking and toilet training, all in succession at developmentally appropriate ages.
Once in school, for skills that require performing a physical task, that are in what
Bloom's Taxonomy classifies as the "psychomotor domain," it is understood that
children will only learn when they are physically and developmentally ready.
No one expects four-year olds to type fluently on a computer keyboard, play
difficult Chopin Etudes on the piano, prepare elaborate meals in the kitchen or
drive a car.

We cannot wish away our biological limitations
because we find them inconvenient.

However, for skills in what Bloom calls the "cognitive domain," the school curriculum
has become blind not only to the progression of normal child development but also
to natural variations in the rate that children develop. It is now expected that pre-school
children should be able to grasp sophisticated concepts in mathematics and written
language. In addition, it is expected that all children should be at the same cognitive
level when they enter kindergarten, and proceed through the entire grade-school
curriculum in lock step with one another. People, who think that all children can learn
in unison, have obviously never worked with special needs children or the gifted
and talented.

Demanding that children be taught to developmentally inappropriate standards
for language and math comprehension is not a harmless experiment. This exercise
in futility wastes the time of teachers and students and unethically sets all of them
up to fail. It exacerbates the very problems that the new curriculum is supposed to fix.
It leaves boys, whose verbal development for biological reasons already lags behind girls,
even further behind and will accelerate the trend of fewer boys going on to college.
Even today boys only make up about 40 percent of college students nationwide
and their numbers will continue to dwindle.

The new curriculum standards and testing regimens are motivated by a well-intentioned
desire to close achievements gaps that exist between the various socio-economic
and ethnic and racial groups. There is a belief that by demanding that all children
meet a set of rigid and arbitrarily high academic standards, achievement gaps can
be closed and economic opportunities increased for all. The apparent reasoning
is that if all children receive the same education and are held to the same academic
standards, then all children will have equal opportunity to succeed as adults.

However, addressing pervasive economic inequality by pretending that in an ideal
world all children should be alike isn't a solution. The inequalities that plague our
society are inherent in the structure of our political and economic systems. A new
curriculum will not change the underlying pathologies corrupting these structures.
It is a mistake to conflate unjust economic inequalities that arise from our broken
political and economic systems with normal differences in abilities and dispositions
among people that arise from being human. If all barriers to inequality were broken
down, people would still be different from one another and normal human development
would still unfold.

Education should be about helping each child, regardless of background or academic readiness, achieve his or her full, unique potential as a human being. It should instill
not just academics but also physical, emotional and social skills, which are also essential
for making meaningful contributions to the well being of our families, communities and the economy. Differences between people that arise across all skill sets and educational
domains are an inherent and valued part of the human experience that should be celebrated
in school, not erased.

Joseph Ganem, Ph.D., (JosephGanem.com) is a professor of physics at Loyola University Maryland, and author of the award-winning book on personal finance: The Two Headed Quarter: How to See Through Deceptive Numbers and Save Money on Everything You Buy. It shows how numbers fool consumers when they make financial decisions. For more information on this award-winning book, visit TheTwoHeadedQuarter.com.
Article was previously published in The Baltimore Sun.

blog comments powered by Disqus
The secret message communicated to most young people today by the society around them is that they are not needed, that the society will run itself quite nicely until they - at some distant point in the future - will take over the reigns. Yet the fact is that the society is not running itself nicely... because the rest of us need all the energy, brains, imagination and talent that young people can bring to bear down on our difficulties. For society to attempt to solve its desperate problems without the full participation of even very young people is imbecile.
Alvin Toffler
Follow The Daily Riff on Follow TDR on Twitter

find us on facebook


Riffing good stories


Cultivating the Entrepreneurial Learner

CJ Westerberg, 11.06.2016

"We dedicate this book to the parents of children who are growing up in the digital age. We hope our contribution will illuminate the strange and wondrous learning styles of the next generation." John Seely Brown

Read Post | Comments
michael jordan.jpg

Famous Failures who didn't "make the grade"

CJ Westerberg, 11.05.2016

What Michael Jordan and Thomas Edison had in common - One Minute Video

Read Post | Comments

Are we creating innovators? 22 Insights

CJ Westerberg, 11.04.2016

C.J. Westerberg dissects Tony Wagner's "Creating Innovators" Video Trailer

Read Post | Comments

Shaping Serendipity for Learning: Conversations with John Seely Brown

CJ Westerberg, 10.22.2016

"Conventional wisdom holds that different people learn in different ways. Something is missing from that idea, however, so we offer a corollary: Different people, when presented with exactly the same information in exactly the same way, will learn different things." - John Seely Brown

Read Post | Comments

Game On!

CJ Westerberg, 10.18.2016

Six Lessons Coaches Can Teach Educators

Read Post | Comments

Hey, so-called Leaders. Want feedback or measurement?

CJ Westerberg, 06.24.2016

What do we measure and why? Questions About The Uses of Measurement by Margaret Wheatley and Myron Kellner-Rogers

Read Post | Comments

Would You Hire Your Own Kids? 7 Skills Schools Should Be Teaching Them

CJ Westerberg, 06.24.2016

Tony Wagner, Former HS teacher, Principal & Co-Director At Harvard School Of Education Posts. "The Ability To Ask The Right Questions Is The Single Most Important Skill."

Read Post | Comments

Can Messy Be A Sign Of Brilliance?

CJ Westerberg, 06.23.2016

Einstein's Desk In Photo: What He & Agatha Christie May Have In Common

Read Post | Comments