Wit & Wisdom

Game Changers & Tales of Triumph and Woe

Time to Re-think School Award Ceremonies?

CJ Westerberg, May 14, 2012 12:04 PM

redcarpet.awards.wejr.jpg

Editor's Note: A Classic - it's that time of year . . .
 

"Virtually every type of expected tangible reward
made contingent on task performance does, in fact,
 undermine intrinsic motivation".
Deci and Ryan

Death of An Awards Ceremony
by Chris Wejr

This is the time of the year that most schools are meeting and arguing over who is the top student in a variety of categories; high schools have selected their valedictorian (mostly based on who has the highest grades) and majority of schools are gearing up for their annual awards ceremony.

Yesterday, at our staff meeting, a decision was made that will change the way we end the year at Kent.

If you are a person who believes school is all about grades and awards, I am afraid that you will not like the decision made by our school yesterday; if you are a person who loves the idea of the "proud parent of an honour roll student" bumper sticker, you may be frustrated by our school.

June 1, 2010 marked the end of a tradition at our school - a tradition that awarded a select few top students not for their efforts and learning but for their grades and achievements. Based on powerful dialogue with our Parent Advisory Council around a strength-based versus deficit-based focus, the staff at Kent School decided to abolish the "awards" part of the year end ceremony.

Academic award winners? No more.  Athletic award winners?  Nope.  Honour roll?  Nuh uh.

Part of our school goal is "for each student in our school to recognize and develop his/her unique talents and interests...".  The key words in this are "each student".  We do not want to just recognize those that excel in specific areas, we want to recognize EACH student for the areas in which he/she excels.

As a school, we need to move away from the traditional educational hierarchy that says those students who excel in language arts and maths are more important than those who excel in fine arts. We need to move away from recognizing only those students who have figured out the "game of school" and know how to "do" school well.

What motivates students? Grades (and honour rolls) or learning? There are many students that are unfortunately only motivated by grades.  This is not their fault, it is what has been taught to them.  The comments such as "if you want an A, you must do this..." or "if you do this, you will lose marks" have taught students that grades and achievement is more of a priority than learning.  Grades are extrinsic motivators while learning results in more intrinsic motivation.  So, do we want students to motivated by grades or learning?
 
When I ask our grade 4 students what the honour roll is, they have not a clue, nor do they care. Yet, in the past we have awarded certain students for getting good grades by giving them a certificate and telling them that they made this esteemed club called the honour roll. By doing this, what are we teaching kids? Are we not teaching them that it is not so much the process of learning that is important but it is the resulting grades and report card marks?

Carol Dweck, in her book, Mindset, talks about the difference between praising students for their effort and ability. If we praise students for "being smart" or "being athletic", research says that we create students who are afraid to take risks and usually shy away from challenges. What kind of students do we want - those that rise to the challenge and take risks or those that believe that what they can or cannot do is 'fixed' and based on how 'smart' they are.

Alfie Kohn sums it up nicely when he writes this about awards:

"...researchers have found that children who are frequently rewarded -- or, in another study, children who receive positive reinforcement for caring, sharing, and helping -- are less likely than other children to keep doing those things.

In short, it makes no sense to dangle goodies in front of children for being virtuous. But even worse than rewards are awards -- certificates, plaques, trophies, and other tokens of recognition whose numbers have been artificially limited so only a few can get them. When some children are singled out as "winners," the central message that every child learns is this: "Other people are potential obstacles to my success."Thus the likely result of making students beat out their peers for the distinction of being the most virtuous is not only less intrinsic commitment to virtue but also a disruption of relationships and, ironically, of the experience of community that is so vital to the development of children's character."


So what will our year-end ceremony look like?  Each grade 6 student will be honoured and recognized for their strengths, talents, and/or interests.  There will be no honour roll, no academic winners (and losers), no athletic award winners (and losers) and no recognition that one student's talents are better than another.  The focus will be on EACH student and not just CERTAIN students. In addition, all students would be recognized daily in class and throughout the year at our monthly student assemblies.

In schools we always need to question and reflect on why we do things.  Why do we present awards to certain students?  If, according to Deci and Ryan, extrinsic motivators take away from intrinsic motivation, and not only will the non-award winners be harmed but also the winners, then why would we continue with our awards tradition? What does this do to help learning in schools?  Our families do not award top child so why do we do this in school?  Why do we state that proficiency in math is more important than excelling in theatre?  How do we motivate our kids? 

When our answers to these questions do not place student learning at the forefront, we need to change the way we do things.   We need to encourage ALL students to be successful
in an area in which they have a strength and are passionate.  At Kent School, we have by no means solved all that is concerning with education, but we have made a step forward.

###
Orig. Pub. June 2010.

Chris Wejr is school principal at Kent Elementary School in British Columbia.  He has spent his career working with students as a high school physical education, math, and science teacher, an intermediate teacher, an elementary vice-principal, as well as a high school volleyball, rugby, track, and basketball coach. You can find him at The Wejr Board.  

Related posts by The Daily Riff:

The Game of School.  Only winners allowed?  Is Learning a Sport?

How to Create Non-readers:  Reflections on Motivation, Learning and Sharing Power in the Classroom  by Alfie Kohn

Teachers Doing the Flip to Help Students Become Better Learners 

Youth Motivation and Mastery: Fires of the Mind

Are We Wrong about Motivation?  Daniel Pink thinks so.

Harry Potter author JK Rowling Captivates Crowd with Harvard Commencement - "In spite of a distinct lack of motivation at University . . . "









1 Comment

| Post a Comment

Way to go. I really like the way your school addressed this issue. Teaching effort is far more important than teaching what are really very shallow and random measures of success. I really look forward to seeing more about this.

Post a Comment

There's something in this country that is so opposed to understanding the complexity of children.
Maurice Sendak RIP, best-selling childrens'author, Where the Wild Things Are, during interview with Stephen Colbert
Follow The Daily Riff on Follow TDR on Twitter

find us on facebook

Thumbnail image for DSC_0163-1_2.jpg

"Was Einstein Right About Imagination?"

CJ Westerberg, 05.18.2012

Would we have more students in the sciences if we laid off our obsession with Math? Must-view 4-minute Video

Read Post | Comments

Riffing good stories

mark zuckerberg.facebook.jpg

Zuckerberg Doesn't Have a Tiger Daddy

CJ Westerberg, 05.17.2012

FACEBOOK Zuckerberg father: "Rather than impose upon your kids or try and steer their lives in a certain direction, to recognize what their strengths are and support their strengths and support the development of the things they're passionate about."

Read Post | Comments
Dear16-year-oldME.melanoma.jpg

Dear 16-year-old Me

CJ Westerberg, 05.17.2012

It's that time of year again. Sun is fun, but . . . spread the word. Video.

Read Post | Comments
transformation.jpg

Teachers Share Their "Aha Moments"

CJ Westerberg, 05.17.2012

"There was a time when I was a young teacher where I really thought my worth as a teacher was judged by how much I could cover and how much I could transmit to kids . . ."

Read Post | Comments
Singapore.2012.Finland.education.innovation.jpg

Innovation in Singaporean Education: More similar to Finland than the U.S.?

CJ Westerberg, 05.17.2012

" . . . every child has a talent . . ."

Read Post | Comments
Al-Pacino.jpg

What we do matters. Al Pacino riffs in this classic . . .

CJ Westerberg, 05.16.2012

"Inches" Make the Difference. Inspiration for students, parents, educators - - -

Read Post | Comments
redcarpet.awards.wejr.jpg

Time to Re-think School Award Ceremonies?

CJ Westerberg, 05.14.2012

Should school leaders take another look at how award ceremonies affect learning and motivation?

Read Post | Comments
global.connected.singapore.jackson.jpg

Tech in Education: Lessons from Singapore (NEW SERIES)

CJ Westerberg, 05.12.2012

Educator Bill Jackson goes to Singapore and shares his Spring 2012 findings

Read Post | Comments
Finland. Finnishflag.BobCompton.jpg

The Finland Phenomenon: Inside the World's Most Surprising School System

CJ Westerberg, 05.10.2012

Can the U.S. and other countries learn from Finland? Or, as some argue, is this an "outlier" country (translate: a country that teaches others no real lessons to others)? We also find juxtaposing Finland's practices with Singapore and Japan, there are several key common themes shared by all, but not witnessed in the U.S., such as teacher autonomy, along with some key differences. You be the decider, and let us know what your riff is

Read Post | Comments