Amidst all the NBC "Education Nation" programming this week, with all the talk about teachers, professionalism, autonomy, accountability, development, unions, control, merit pay and the like, it was an NPR "Talk of the Nation" chat that caught my attention yesterday.
Host Neal Conan interviewed Atul Gawande, professor of surgery at Harvard Medical School, with Gawande explaining his aha moment while watching one of my favorite athletes - tennis champion Rafa Nadal - at Wimbledon. Noting that someone of Nadal's caliber and super-star status looked up to his coach during the match inspired his piece in next week's The New Yorker magazine entitled "Personal Best". His premise, "Top athletes and musicians have coaches. Should you?" Excerpts from both below. Let us know what you think.
Hope to have more on some Education Nation after digesting and viewing a bit more.
- C.J. Westerberg
Coaches for Teachers
"The coaching model is different from the traditional conception of pedagogy, where there's a presumption that, after a certain point, the student no longer needs instruction.
You graduate. You're done.
You can go the rest of the way yourself."
- "Personal Best," Atul Gawande
On the teaching model versus the coaching model
"The coaching model [is] what you think of with athletes and singers, who have someone who coaches them all the way through their career, even if they're one of the best in the world. But violinists and surgeons - at least in our theory of how we're supposed to do it - we don't. You go to medical school, you go to Juilliard, and you graduate. You get a degree, you get in your 10,000 hours of practice, and then some cream [is] supposed to rise to the top.
"But I was really struck by how different these models are and tried to understand it ... I had a fascinating discussion with Itzhak Perlman, the great violinist, and I said, 'Why don't violinists have coaches, but singers do?' And he said, 'I don't know, but I think it's a mistake.' "
On how schools are using coaches to improve teacher performance
"We now know that in teaching, the most important thing for the outcomes of students ... that the school has control over is the quality of the teaching. A bunch of [studies] have shown that when you have teachers go through workshops [and] learn some new skills about teaching math or teaching English, less than 20 percent are using those skills six months later."
"But if you have a coach follow them into the classroom, even just once a month, and
watch them try that out, they get to over a 75 percent likelihood that they'll use
those skills."
"And so now there [are] more than 100 school districts where they've put in coaches in the classroom who come once every couple weeks, watch the teacher teach, and then give them detailed feedback. They work on an agenda that the teacher helps set ... They work on their problems handling the student behavior or planning the class or dealing with time management."
especially for those who are well along in their career.
I'm ostensibly an expert.
I'd finished long ago with the days of
being tested and observed.
I am supposed to be past needing such things.
Why should I expose
myself to scrutiny and fault-finding?"
- "Personal Best," Atul Gawande
On the difference between a coach and a teacher
"The coach is someone whose job is to be on your side of the fence ... They're there ... to help you achieve your maximum potential, and help you figure out how to get there along the way. And it's a funny relationship, because in individual sports - the professional ice skater or tennis player - they hire and fire the coach.
The coach is the boss of you, but they're not the boss."###Posted September 2011 The Daily Riff
Related posts The Daily Riff:
10 Ways to Build Resilience by Edna Sackson with video of Jay McTighue
The Fires of the Mind: What Does It Take To Get Really Good at Something?
Parents: Are We Sabotaging Our Own Math Ability? Effort is Key



Post a Comment